Text

Crouxsade

Last Wednesday’s, “Michel Roux on Bread” as part of the BBC Two series, the Great British Food Revival confirmed that there are few things that make me more annoyed than celebrity chefs on a crusade. This term I use, “crusade”, isn’t me attempting to mock Michel Roux for being over-zealous, this is literally the word he chose to use to describe what he felt he was doing himself. He genuinely believes that a good man should go to war over bread… and admittedly, many have. As a history student an obvious pattern in history is identifiable: when bread prices go too high, SHIT GOES DOWN. Countless rebellions and revolutions have been sparked throughout time by bread. So yes, Michel kind of has a point: bread is definitely a cause worth fighting for. However, crops haven’t failed, famines haven’t struck, and bread prices are stable… hooray! So then, “what could Michel’s Bread Crusade possibly be about?” I hear you ask. Well, it’s not the price of bread that gets to Michel. What grinds his gears is what he perceives to be a lack of respect for bread. He is the first revolutionary of his kind: the first man to be up in arms because people simply aren’t middle-class enough about their bread.

He was livid, absolutely livid that people such as you and I are content to go and buy our bread from the supermarket. How fucking dare we. The aim of Michel’s crusade appears to be to eliminate from society all the people who wish to buy their bread from supermarkets in order to save time, and to replace these Bread Heretics with a purer faith, whose beliefs about bread are staggeringly ridiculous. His main problem seems to be that people don’t spend enough of their free time making and baking their own bread, and therefore they don’t value or respect bread for what it is. To which I can’t help but reply…WELL OF COURSE YOU’LL MAKE BREAD IN YOUR SPARE TIME, YOU UTTER TWAT, BECAUSE YOU’RE A PROFESSIONAL FUCKING CHEF! You have A) the knowhow and skills to create good bread; B) if you’re a professional chef one probably assumes that you quite enjoy cooking in your spare time; and C) being a celebrity chef you earn a considerable amount more money than the average person, so the tesco-value thin white slice probably doesn’t have the same appeal to you because hey, you can afford not to buy supermarket bread and instead buy fresh ingredients to make your own bread. Price isn’t an issue for you, but it very much is for most people, and you are horrendous if you think you’re allowed to look down on someone for that reason, which clearly, you do.

It is this kind of mentality in many cookery-programs and celebrity chef’s brains that is entirely, woefully, out of touch with the real life for the majority, and is honestly something I find offensive. Picture this scene: Dave, 26, gets home from his 9 to 5 as a salesman. Dave really needs to let off steam and thinks a nice drink down the pub with his mate would be an ideal way to do so. His mate decides to call him up and asks Dave, “fancy going for one or two down the pub Dave?” What luck! But wait, as Dave goes to say yes he realises something important and has to turn his mate’s offer of a drink or two at the pub down. He puts the phone down, dejected. Dave realised he has to stay in tonight, cause he’s out of bread, and because he’d been listening to Michel Roux and was now a snobby cunt who didn’t like the idea of buying his bread from the supermarket, he had to spend his evening making and baking his own bread instead of letting off steam from a hard day at work, because otherwise he’d have no toast for the morning and no sandwiches to take with him for lunch. Later that evening Dave slits his own throat with a bread knife out of a mixture of boredom and depression, all thanks to Michel Roux.

This story is fictional, but it was written with the intention of making a point: MICHEL ROUX, PEOPLE DON’T HAVE THE TIME IN THEIR EVERYDAY LIVES TO BAKE THEIR OWN FUCKING BREAD. That’s why they get it at the supermarket… not because they don’t respect good food, not because they have malfunctioning taste buds as you seem to believe, but for the simple reason that it is both cheaper and more convenient. You literally couldn’t sound more out of touch, standing there in your MASSIVE kitchen, telling people in a time of financial-crisis, that they’re bad people for not using their precious time and resources to make and bake their own unique loaf.

Being out of touch really is a trend amongst celebrity chefs. Whether it’s Jamie Oliver telling us that he’s got a great and effective way to get our kids to eat their five a day, then preceding to mash up about 20 quids worth of fresh fruit just to get the measly amount of juice inside so that he can freeze that juice into a tiny ice lolly, which let’s be honest, is only ever going to work on a daily basis for mums and dads if they’ve got a six figure salary to burn on copious amounts of fresh fruit that you’re not even going to eat; or Heston Blumenthal declaring his own crusade against those bastards, the NHS, by getting angry at the NHS for not caring enough about the food they provide their hospital patients, when the answer – probably all those bleeping machines and doctors and medical supplies that you tend to find in NHS hospitals – to why the NHS don’t spend enough money on quality food is staring him straight in his fucking face. Celebrity chefs are repeatedly, repeatedly, repeatedly out of touch with real life. They are not only presenting themselves as a deluded, condescending, egotistical bunch, they are also downright offensive.

Photo
My head is going to explode with how much I love this album.

My head is going to explode with how much I love this album.

Text

Support the New Campaign

A largely discussed issue on Saturday’s Football Focus was the need to kick racism out of football. This is all very well, BBC, good on you. I mean, personally, I didn’t think John Terry could become much more of a disgusting human being, but hell, he went and  proved everyone wrong, because now apparently he doesn’t like black people: even when they’re the brother of someone he might have to play side by side with in England’s defence. God, JT, way to make things awkward. But sorry, I digress, I’m just distracted by John Terry’s awfulness, let’s get back to Football Focus. Now I don’t think anyone would disagree with the sentiments expressed by Dan Walker, Lawro and Peter Reid on Saturday: those sentiments being that basically racism has NO PLACE in football, or ANYWHERE for that matter. But what the BBC failed to understand is that they are creating an altogether bigger problem in football. They are responsible for a much darker side to football than racism. I am talking of course, about the Gallagher Brothers.

It was in the first few seconds of the first episode of this season’s Football Focus that I knew the problem had yet to be stamped out, as Liam Gallagher appeared in the opening credits, sending shockwaves of repulsion through my spine. I mean seriously BBC, I love you, I do, but YOU HAVE GOT TO END YOUR OBSESSION WITH THE GALLAGHER BROTHERS. More importantly, this obsession with getting the Gallagher’s opinions on football. NO ONE CARES. LIAM GALLAGHER IS NOT RELEVANT TO ANY ASPECT OF PEOPLE’S LIVES ANY MORE AND HASN’T BEEN SINCE THE LATE FUCKING 90S, AND HE’S ESPECIALLY NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORLD OF FOOTBALL. Football to me is joyous and beautiful, don’t tarnish it by paying Liam Gallagher to talk about the events of a game and how he doesn’t like Gary Neville’s face (because no one likes Gary Neville’s face – why does it become news when one of the Gallagher brothers says they don’t) in his awful droning voice, and then put him in a woefully cringy montage of the 6-1 win in which he kisses his Man City badge. Urgh, that was gross. (A quick point I feel I should add – I support neither of the Manchester clubs). Those producing football programs on the BBC seem to be obsessed with the idea that football should go hand in hand with lad-rock scum. I’ve been trying for a while to make my girlfriend see the good sides of football, to explain what it gives people and society (it must be said to no avail, however), but because of the way football is presented I think she finds it hard to see the game for what it is. Only the other week infact, she said, “why is it that all football shows seem to exclusively play Kasabian? I think Kasabian are why I hate football”.

This love affair with the Gallagher’s can be traced back, off the top of my head, as far back as 2006. I recall that it was the World Cup Semi-Final between Italy and Germany, but apparently even a World Cup Semi-Final didn’t give the BBC pundits enough to fucking talk about without killing time by giving Noel Gallagher a ten minute slot basically just to tell us that he was friends with Italy striker, Allesandro Del Piero. Really, Noel Gallagher had a celebrity friend who’s a footballer? Well I’d never of guessed, you informative bastards!

So you can talk about kicking racism out of football all you want, but please, just put it to side for one minute, and acknowledge that there’s a greater problem at hand, and that you are very much part of the problem, BBC: Let’s Kick the Gallagher’s Out of Football.

One more quick note: despite how the article reads, I do infact consider racism to be a more serious issue than the Gallagher brother’s sporadic appearances on BBC football programs - if you were wondering.

Quote
"They turned a youth centre into a casino,
they drew a swastika in your cappucino,
and the V.I.P lines are not to the clubs
but to healthcare, apartments and jobs."

Waiting for Kirsten - Jens Lekman

Text

Adverts

Now I know advertisers come in for an awful lot of stick as it is – there aren’t many easier targets out there – but over the last two weeks I’ve been house sitting and looking after two lovely dogs for my best friend’s family. And in these two weeks – having spent a large part of my time lazing around in front of the TV as though it was a task assigned to me by god – there were some adverts that struck me as so stunningly repulsive, annoying or downright stupid that I can no longer not vent my annoyance at them. There are too many to choose from so I’ve been compiling a list in my head of the worst adverts on TV right now and I’ve narrowed it down to a top four.

So, in fourth place:

It’s KGB Deals.

My qualms here are simply founded in the name of the company.

Do these people have ANY idea of the associated connotations people hold with the name “KGB”? You wouldn’t name your business “Stasi Coffee” or “the NKVD”, so why name it the “KGB”?

Maybe it’s some kind of Russian Government-funded ploy, a clever attempt at the amelioration of the name, so that now when anyone says “KGB” you instantly think of three fitties in tight jeans driving around trying to find some good car insurance rather than the suppression of ideological subversion and the thousands of people unjustly imprisoned in the gulag, the Soviet’s forced-labour camp system. And it’s almost as though the advertisers in this instance are acutely aware of the nature of the company’s shared title-holder, for the three female employees (unrealistically represented employees I’m sure) are referred to, for what we can only assume is a SICK JOKE – either that or staggering ignorance – as the KGB “Agents”. AGENTS! It then goes on to inform us that they are DEALMAKERS! They are Deal-making Agents working for the KGB. Nice.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uU2dHfrgWFg

In third place:

Haribo.

This is a certain case of trying to fix something when it AIN’T broke. It is advertising suicide. Haribo: your adverts were actually fine. Not great but they were fine. The one with the little girl who interrogates the dad, that was fine. It was an advert that did the job: it was minimally amusing, and a bit lovable. It was fine. At the very least Haribo adverts of the past haven’t encouraged me, alike the company responsible, to commit suicide. There are few sights in the world that evoke such an a feeling of repulsion in me than when the dad - he’s the worst of the lot - swings around, arms wide, and then hops towards his woefully out-of-tune family singing, “SQUIDGY, SQUIDGY BABY!”. It is a harrowing scene filled with a ridiculously plastic-looking set, a set of unconvincing “smiles” and white-people dancing. It’s bad. Very, very bad. Next time I go to the cinema and binge on sweets, forget Haribo, I’m going for the natural confectionary company. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrGJ0vO_NXs

In second place:

Lucozade.

This is one makes for particularly painful viewing. Mainly because it’s like watching an interpretation of what my dad feels is representative of youth culture, or of that bastard abstract idea of “cool”. Look at them, they’re so cool, rolling downhill with heavy equipment, that’s surely dangerous! God aren’t those guys OUTRAGEOUS. They’re rad man, they’re down, they’re it. They just play by NO ONE’S RULES. NO ONE’S.

Now I’d never pretend to be an authority on what’s cool, cause hey, that just ain’t cool… but I’m fairly sure Feeder aren’t cool. They get played every Friday night, without fail, at my university’s CHEESE night. This advert is an amalgamation and depiction of trends that existed about a decade ago: it’s more a source of historical relevance than a contemporary advert for the here and now.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS9kBbWUeuo

And at number one:

THE SMUG, SPOILT-SHIT-OF-A-KID WITH THE FUCKING SODA STREAM.

Like I said, I watched a lot of TV over the past-fortnight. And when you watch a lot of TV it’s quite easy to end up watching a lot of Friends, especially when it’s in its last week of its sixteen-year run on British television. There were thirty-one hours of Friends on during its final week, and in each every one of those episodes was sponsored by SodaStream. The adverts varied with each break, but each involved a pretty picture of a SodaStream and a voice-over by a posh, middle-class little brat boasting about the way his MILF of a mum spoiled him by having a soda-stream. The kid would state in a misleadingly sad tone, “we’ve only got one bottle of fizz in our house”. Then he’d pause and quip smugly, “WITH THIRTY-TWO DIFFERENT FLAVOURS!”

He’s overwhelmingly smug. And I hate him. I hate smugness, and in no place do I hate smugness more than in the face and voice of a floppy-haired upper-middle class child. His dad’s clearly an investment-banker. His mum thinks all homeless people bring trouble on themselves. His grandparents think that all social problems in the country are a result of “letting-in the blacks.” He’s that type of kid. He laughs at the poorer kid who brings a packed-lunch to school consisting of a dairylea sandwich and a packet of frazzles, whilst he chomps in the kids face on his duck and fennel ciabatta and his kettle chips. He’s just that kind of kid. And I hate him. Or maybe, maybe, I just really wish I’d had a soda stream when I was younger. ..Maybe. 

Text

My “reasons why I wish I was Dan Snow” list just keeps on growing. 

What a glorious man…

All historians should aspire to be this bloody cool, 

rather than horrendously racist like David Starkey.  

Quote
"I do like your program…
but it does make the world seem most unbearably real"

— The Hour, Episode Four - Jane Kish

Photoset

jaune:

They are very even.
Yo
ur ears.

Quote
"a shape stirs beneath me,
a pulse pounds along bloodstreams,
the first bite marks the beginning of the
clotheless wrestle with the clotheless animal"

— Frightened Rabbit - The Wrestle

Quote
"The report makes crystal clear that the police shot the right man.
But as far as I’m aware the wrong man exploded. Is that clear?"

— Four Lions - Malcolm Storage MP